What is a common disadvantage of implementing a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)?

Implementing a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) often involves extensive time and effort from municipal officials. This planning process is critical as it addresses the identification, prioritization, and scheduling of significant capital projects, such as infrastructure improvements, public facility upgrades, and community development initiatives. Officials must conduct thorough research, engage with stakeholders, analyze financial impacts, and create a long-term strategy—tasks that can be labor-intensive and time-consuming.

The necessity of detailed planning and community engagement ensures that projects align with the community's long-term goals and needs, but it also means that officials must dedicate substantial resources to develop an effective CIP. This investment of time and effort can be seen as a disadvantage, especially when compared to the potential benefits of streamlined project delivery or increased funding opportunities that a well-structured CIP can offer.